Monday, April 9, 2007
Philocrites, now non-mission essential!
Updated! A longtime reader who works for the U.S. Air Force sent me email early last week saying that his work computer can no longer access this site. Instead, typing "www.philocrites.com" into his browser brings up the following amazing legalese:
The Site You Are Trying To Access Is Prohibited
Category of Blocked URL: "Forum/Bulletin Boards"
Monitoring of Your Web Activity is Being Performed
Reference AFI 33-129, Web Management and Internet Use, paragraph 2: "The activities listed in paragraphs 2.2.1 through 2.2.14 involving the use of government-provided computer hardware or software are specifically prohibited: 2.2.1 Use of Federal government communications systems for unathorized personal use."
IAW AFI 33-219, Telecommunications Monitoring and Assessment Program (TMAP), Paragraph 13
If the site you are trying to access is mission essential please contact your local NCC Help Desk to request access.
This is a Department of Defense computer system. This computer system, including all related equipment, networks, and network devices (specifically including Internet access) are provided only for authorized U.S. Government use. DoD computer systems may be monitored for all lawful purposes, including to ensure that their use is authorized, for management of the system, to facilitate protection against unauthorized access, and to verify security procedures, survivability, and operational security. Monitoring includes active attacks by authorized DoD entities to test or verify the security of this system. During monitoring, information may be examined, recorded, copied, and used for authorized purposes. All information, including personal information, placed or sent over this system may be monitored. Use of this DoD computer system, authorized or unauthorized, constitutes consent to monitoring of this system. Unauthorized use may subject you to criminal prosecution. Evidence of unauthorized use collected during monitoring may be used for administrative, criminal, or other adverse action. Use of this system constitutes consent to monitoring for these purposes.
Hmm. Although I've often felt that this blog takes up a lot of my time, my traffic counter says the average reader spends less than 2 minutes on the site, so government worries about time-wasting employees seem unwarranted.
But wait! My traffic logs show that a reader from the U.S. Department of Justice visited my site on Thursday morning, March 29, at 9:24, after clicking a link from the Mormon blog Times and Seasons where people were discussing Dick Cheney's commencement speech controversy at BYU. (At the time, my front page had two stories that might make a pro-Bush DOJ employee unhappy: I cheered a National Association of Evangelicals public statement condemning U.S. torture, and complained about BYU's selection of Dick Cheney as commencement speaker. Other than that, it was pretty slim pickings here.) I'd hate to cast aspersions, but it does make you wonder.
Instead of drawing conclusions, I'd prefer to gather more evidence. If you can read this site from your government computer, drop me a line and let me know. If you can't read the site from work, I can suggest some alternate ways to get your daily fix, including signing up for email delivery. And if you're a legalistic scold who would like to say that Air Force employees should avoid extracurricular reading during the workday, don't you dare leave a comment between 9 and 5. Get back to work!
Update: Apparently the Air Force blocked lots of blogs last April, too — here are progressive blogs crying foul — but Federal Computer Week magazine reported in October that system-wide screens for "productivity categories" (i.e., time-wasters) can be enhanced by local system operators to screen out individual sites. Perhaps my DOJ visitor is vindicated? ("Air Force censors liberal websites, but leaves conservative ones alone" [blog entry], AmberJane, DailyKos 4.24.06; "Boutelle: Army not blocking political sites," Josh Rogin, FCW.com 10.26.06)
Copyright © 2007 by Philocrites | Posted 9 April 2007 at 8:02 AM
Previous: This week at uuworld.org: Personal Jesus.
Next: Add uuworld.org headlines to your site.
8 comments:
Philocrites:
April 9, 2007 08:19 AM | Permalink for this comment
To be clear: I am pointing to a coincidence that a visitor from a Department of Justice server came to this site from a Cheney-related post at Times and Seasons and spent several minutes only a few days before the site became unavailable on at least one Air Force office computer network. It seems unlikely, but possible, that my site ended up on a restricted list as a result.
Philocrites:
April 9, 2007 10:27 AM | Permalink for this comment
Apparently a bunch of liberal blogs were blocked from other Air Force computer last April, which means I'm a year late to the party. This article from Federal Computer Week magazine includes the following interesting material:
Is my DOJ visitor vindicated? Could be! But why would the Air Force crack down on websites in April last year and again this year?
("Boutelle: Army not blocking political sites," Josh Rogin, FCW.com 10.26.06)
Philocrites:
April 9, 2007 08:50 PM | Permalink for this comment
Government Executive magazine's "TechInsider" blog is seeking input about other sites that may have been barred from Air Force computers.
Philocrites:
April 10, 2007 08:01 AM | Permalink for this comment
A reader from the Army writes:
Could be! I'll check with my Air Force correspondent to see how long the block remains active.
Joe:
April 10, 2007 08:44 AM | Permalink for this comment
This website is viewable from an AFB in OK.
leveymg:
April 10, 2007 09:09 AM | Permalink for this comment
If the US Air Force needs to restrict on-line materials it deems unsuitable for its personnel, may I suggest it track visits to web sites that carry messages advocating the inevitability of the end of all human life on this planet.
USAF security might want to include that to their list of suspicious activities requiring investigation, and add the following question to the battery of psychological testing:
"Is it your belief that the End of Times is coming with the Christian Messiah, and that with it will come the End of the World and the Rapture?"
When Air Force personnel attempt to access fundamentalist Christian web sites, they might see the following message:
_______________________________________________
THE SITE YOU ARE TRYING TO ACCESS IS PROHIBITED
Those who indicate by their observed web viewing habits any tendency toward belief in doctrines advocating or endorsing the desirability of the End of the World by fire or ice shall be reassigned to posts outside of the chain of command, control or custody of nuclear weapons.
Such persons thus identified as security risks should may have their status reviewed for suitability for continued government service.
All information, including personal information, placed or sent over this system may be monitored. Use of this DoD computer system, authorized or unauthorized, constitutes consent to monitoring of this system. Unauthorized use may subject you to criminal prosecution. Evidence of unauthorized use collected during monitoring may be used for administrative, criminal, or other adverse action. Use of this system constitutes consent to monitoring for these purposes.
__________________________________________________
Let's see how they like that regulation and surveillance of the Internet in Colorado Springs.
Philocrites:
April 17, 2007 02:56 PM | Permalink for this comment
My original Air Force correspondent says one more Unitarian Universalist blog also brings up the "prohibited" image: Debitage.
Meanwhile, readers have written to say that they can read the site from their government-operated ISP, including a State Department reader, an Army reader, and another Air Force reader. Sounds like a local prohibition to me.
Philocrites:
May 15, 2007 01:59 PM | Permalink for this comment
The Department of Defense is now blocking access to thirteen different social-networking sites, including YouTube and MySpace.
"A casualty of war: MySpace: U.S. military blocks popular web sites, cutting ties to home," Alan Sipress and Sam Diaz, Washington Post 5.15.07, reg req'd)
Comments for this entry are currently closed.