Wednesday, June 1, 2005
Josh Marshall introduces new liberal group blog.
Joshua Micah Marshall, the journalist-blogger of Talking Points Memo, has brought together an impressive group of experts and writers for TPMCafe, a new group blog modeled on Daily Kos — complete with user diaries — but with a much more impressive roster of contributors. The American Prospect's Matthew Yglesias has moved his eponymous blog to TPMCafe; I'm thrilled to see the New Yorker's George Packer on the foreign policy blog; and what's not to love about having former senator John Edwards blogging about poverty?
Copyright © 2005 by Philocrites | Posted 1 June 2005 at 8:22 AM
Previous: In memoriam.
Next: Modest site adjustments.
Advertising
Advertising
Philocrites
"Obscure and literary!" (The Daily Show with Jon Stewart)
Commentary by Chris Walton on Unitarian Universalism, liberal Christianity, American religion, and liberal culture. Email me.
Promoting
- Unitarian Universalists
- About Unitarian Universalism
- Best of UU
- UUWorld.org (weekly)
- My guide to UU blogs
- Interdependent web
- UUpdates (aggregator)
- UUBlogSearch
- UU podcasts
- News (Google)
- News (Topix)
- News (uuworld.org)
- UUs in the media
4 comments:
James Field:
June 1, 2005 12:51 PM | Permalink for this comment
What do you think about this as a model for UU blogs? I've sometimes thought it would be a better to be an occasional contributor/diarist to a UU group blog rather than keeping up my own blog. I guess livejournal functions that way somewhat.
Philocrites:
June 1, 2005 01:07 PM | Permalink for this comment
I like it very much -- and once I'm finished launching the web magazine version of UU World, I'll actively encourage some conversation about turning Coffee Hour into a selective but growing group blog. I think many people are in your situation, and rather than spread everything thin, I'd like to find a way to bring a range of strong voices together.
Before naysayers say nay, I'll preemptively suggest that group blogs don't diminish individual blogs; in fact, they're likely to encourage more blogs overall by giving more people a way to imagine participating. Most people don't have time to follow a bazillion blogs; they want a small handful. But once they get hooked by those handful, they may see an opening for what they have to say -- and launch their own, or comment so eloquently that they get invited to join a group blog, too!
fausto:
June 1, 2005 02:45 PM | Permalink for this comment
Say nay? No way!
TransparentEye:
June 3, 2005 07:17 PM | Permalink for this comment
I would be happy to fold my TransparentEye blog into a group blog.
There are only a few individual bloggers (like our esteemed Philocrities) who can sustain a following. For the rest of us, it helps to join up with others. That worked well with the centrist political blog which I started, Centerfield. New people can join up and they quickly have people commenting on their posts, which is a lot more fun than writing things and not being sure if anyone is reading.
Comments for this entry are currently closed.