Main content | Sidebar | Links
Advertising

Sunday, March 9, 2003

The road not taken.

Josh Marshall explains that his opposition to Bush's war is not an about-face:

Many people are now championing the merits of robust containment. But if you think back to a couple years ago the whole point was how our sanctions against Saddam were killing all those Iraqi children. Another point was that containing Saddam required us to garrison troops in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf emirates and that made for a fertile breeding ground for bin Ladenism. Even now, I think it's right to say that Saddam is contained. But how long can we contain him? We have 250,000 troops on his borders. It's taken that much to squeeze this grudging level of compliance out of the regime. How long can we maintain that? At how much expense? At how much diplomatic and cultural collateral damage, as we managed to build up during the first decade of containment?

I don't say these are in themselves justifications for war. But it is not enough simply to say you oppose war. That statement brings with it a responsibility to say what the proper policy is or would be. If you think Saddam is contained now then it's incumbent on you to say how you imagine perpetuating that state of affairs into the future. And what the costs will be to your policy.

But as with other disheartened "liberal hawks," Marshall's war is not the war Bush is about to launch.

Copyright © 2003 by Philocrites | Posted 9 March 2003 at 10:31 PM

Previous: Et cetera.
Next: Did Lysistrata wear pink, too?

Advertising

Advertising

0 comments:



Comments for this entry are currently closed.