Wednesday, June 26, 2002
Is Unitarian Universalism a 'new religion'?
Matthew Gatheringwater wrote:
It strikes me that both neoPaganism and UUism are new religions. Although UUs are connected to a historical tradition, our present incarnation is only forty-some years old; Pagans aren't the only one making things up as they go along!
In my view, to the extent that we UUs think of ourselves as a "new religion," we consign our movement to irrelevancy, intellectual confusion, and spiritual shallowness. But then, I don't think of "Unitarian Universalism" as a religion. I think of it as a community of congregations that share a number of liberal theological impulses and a range of traditions. If we are making things up as we go along, we're in serious trouble.
We may have a theological tradition, we may even have an approach to religion, we may still be (in a number of significant ways) a radically Protestant denomination.
We're a tradition that still depends on the grammar of Christianity, as it were, even if we prefer the vocabulary of other traditions — a point Jack Hayward makes in various ways in his writing.
(Originally posted to UUBooks)
Copyright © 2002 by Philocrites | Posted 26 June 2002 at 1:16 PM