Monday, March 24, 2003
Right war, wrong time.
The Kennedy School's Joseph Nye picks apart several deeply flawed aspects of Bush's case for war, like a purported link between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda, but concludes:
Those of us who are critical of the clumsy handling and timing of the war must admit that indefinite containment was unlikely to succeed.
Saddam Hussein had a record of taking high risks, a clear intention to develop weapons of mass destruction, and a proven willingness to use them.
Enforcing Security Council Resolutions 687 and 1441 is better than returning to the evasive politics of the 1990s when Saddam Hussein successfully defied a divided United Nations.
We multilateralists must now hope that the war is brief, that the Iraqi people will visibly welcome the removal of a tyrant, and that the reconstruction of Iraq will involve many countries and a United Nations role.
Nye believes the aftermath of war can "recover some of the legitimacy after the fact that the administration squandered before the war" — if the U.S. handles it correctly. His March 14 Washington Post op-ed identifies some of the merits and dangers of Bush's doctrine of preventive war.
Copyright © 2003 by Philocrites | Posted 24 March 2003 at 6:00 PM
Previous: Baghdad's blogger.
Next: Friedman vs. Sullivan.
0 comments:
Comments for this entry are currently closed.